It is illegal to put a 604 in a 1.5 cu ft box!
"James, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!" World's scariest Volvo: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKn-LTNa4rc[/url]
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
sorry, last time I checied, 42.5 liters equealed 1,5 cubic feet.
"James, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!" World's scariest Volvo: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKn-LTNa4rc[/url]
Hmm, IIRC, the 3.5 ohms was due to Jay's tube amp, so was tuned to the Iconic/GPA's Fs to maximize power conversion and you used it too.
Anyway, as a general rule for HIFI apps, I prefer/recommend an Fs or lower tuning and EQ if necessary to flatten it out in-room, but if you’re using a typical SS or tube PP amp, then try the cab as is first without any added resistance.
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
Sorry, I copied out of GM's doc to Jay and L=Length of the internal longest dimension of the cab, not Liters. So, ~10.3 cu ft.
OK, thanks again.
BTW - with the 604s in that box and my SE valve amp, I tried first w/o any added R and it sounded flat and thin. I then used a variable and found ~3R works very nicely so I added a fixed r.
You’re welcome!
OK, then tune to Fs and experiment with up to 3 ohms if required.
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

Yes, measured in my garage. This weekend, I'll take them outside, refresh the imepedance and T/S plots, and take another FR measurement.
That crazy FR rise at the end of the range is pretty typical woofer cone breakup; from what I've read*, paper cones and dustcaps (particularly lightweight ones) have exaggerated peaks like that.
*Some interesting references:
The Art of Speaker Design Part II
Cone Breakup Simulation
Woofer Design Tutorial
- Mike
shouldn't you measure them where they're gonna sit and then tune them to a flat response?
Bookmarks